I’m not as bright and as good in this as Armstrong but I’ll give it a try.Blondie wrote:Can you restate this?Indy wrote:Throw gold plated banana/s at the most dominant apes all over the world and learn them, that they have to share them immediately because they are not allowed to have it all. At that very moment they are not in control anymore and other apes will take over.
I'm not understanding this part, but the rest of your comment is clear to me.
Like I stated there will always be leaders but they need money/wealth to stay in power. I explained that in above posts.
They will always try to find a way to get their hands on money/wealth to continue that power.
Now consider the Darwin principles.
Imagine that this bunch of apes is not powerful enough to support their leader, because the whole group couldn’t manage to find enough banana/s to support themselves (lack of craftsmanship, natural resources or gold). The group will weaken and so will their leaders. Eventually they will be overrun by another stronger group with stronger leaders. And again you’ll have a bigger group of apes with strong leaders who will take all the banana/s and maybe leave some for the rest.
Another scenario is that this first group was powerful enough, but the leaders could not manage to perform strong because they had to share too much banana/s with the group. Their respect would decline and eventually there will be lack of leadership within this group. It is just a matter of time that some strong young males and/or females, who notice the lack of leadership, will stand up and start to fight over hierarchy and leadership. And again you will have new leaders who will take all banana/s.
However some groups of people in some "designed" countries did manage to avoid that central leadership for long time, like Afghanistan, and within that groups Gold was assumed to be wealth, even over money. Until they were overrun by Taliban, the Russians, the US and now we have a beautiful community, do we …..
Before this evolves into a new discussion about human behavior, what I don’t want !, freegold is NOT going to change human behavior. If freegold is going to limit the ruling leaders, that leaders are going to change the name of the game. Only if freegold can benefit the group as a whole (including all the stolen wealth that is needed for leaders to stay in power), it makes a chance. Until now all the freegold advocates state that freegold will force governments to limit spending ....
The Internet revolution for example benefits us all. It benefits people like us, but also benefits our leaders because they can spy on us, manipulate us and control us. You can change systems, but they have to benefit human evolution as a whole or otherwise they’ll evaporate.